Paper detail

A nonlinear theory of the parallel firehose and gyrothermal instabilities in a weakly collisional plasma

Weakly collisional plasmas dynamically develop pressure anisotropies with respect to the magnetic field. These anisotropies trigger plasma instabilities at scales just above the ion Larmor radius ρ_i and much below the mean free path λ_{mfp}. They have growth rates of a fraction of the ion cyclotron frequency - much faster than either the global dynamics or local turbulence. The instabilities dramatically modify the transport properties and, therefore, the macroscopic dynamics of the plasma. Their nonlinear evolution drives pressure anisotropies towards marginal stability, controlled by the plasma beta β_i. Here this nonlinear evolution is worked out for the simplest analytically tractable example - the parallel firehose instability. In the nonlinear regime, both analytical theory and the numerical solution predict secular growth of magnetic fluctuations. They develop a k^{-3} spectrum, extending from scales somewhat larger than ρ_i to the maximum scale that grows secularly with time (~t^{1/2}); the relative pressure anisotropy (\pperp-\ppar)/\ppar tends to the marginal value -2/β_i. The marginal state is achieved via changes in the magnetic field, not particle scattering. When a parallel ion heat flux is present, the firehose mutates into the new gyrothermal instability (GTI), which continues to exist up to firehose-stable values of pressure anisotropy, which can be positive and are limited by the heat flux. The nonlinear evolution of the GTI also features secular growth of magnetic fluctuations, but the spectrum is eventually dominated by modes around the scale ~ρ_i l_T/λ_{mfp}, where l_T is the scale of the parallel temperature variation. Implications for momentum and heat transport are speculated about. This study is motivated by the dynamics of galaxy cluster plasmas.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.