Paper detail

A nonextensive approach to the stellar rotational evolution I. F and G type stars

The pioneering study by Skumanich (1972) showed that the rotational velocity of G-type Main-Sequence (MS) stars decreases with stellar age according to $<v \sin i>$ $\propto$ $t^{-1/2}$. This relationship is consistent with simple theories of angular momentum loss from rotating stars, where an ionized wind is coupled to the star by a magnetic field. The present study introduces a new approach to the study of stellar rotational braking in unsaturated F and G type stars limited in age and mass, connecting angular momentum loss by magnetic stellar wind with Tsallis nonextensive statistical mechanics. As a result, we show that the rotation-age relationship can be well reproduced using a nonextensive approach from Tsallis nonextensive models. Here, the index $q$, which is related to the degree of nonextensivity, can be associated to the dynamo process and to magnetic field geometry, offering relevant information on the level of stellar magnetic braking for F- and G-type Main-Sequence stars.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.