Paper detail

A non-uniform distribution property of most orbits, in case the $3x+1$ conjecture is true

Let $T(n)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}3n+1&(n\hbox{ odd})\frac n2&(n\hbox{ even})\end{array}\right.$ ($n\in\mathbb Z$). We call "the orbit of the integer $n$", the set $$ \mathcal O_n:=\{m\in\mathbb Z\;:\;\exists k\ge0,\ m=T^k(n)\} $$ and we put $c_i(n):=\#\{m\in\mathcal O_n\;:\;m\equiv i\hbox{ mod.}18\}$. Let $W$ be the set of the integers whose orbit contains $1$ and is, in the following sense, about well distributed modulo $18$ between the six elements of the set $I:=\{1,5,7,11,13,17\}$ (the elements of \{1,\dots,18\} that are odd and not divisible by $3$). More precisely: $$ W:=\Big\{n\in\mathbb N\;:\;\exists k\ge0,\ T^k(n)=1\hbox{ and }\forall i\in I,\ \frac{c_i(n)}{\sum_{i\in I}c_i(n)}\le\frac16+0.0215\Big\}. $$ We prove that $W$ has density $0$ in $\mathbb N$. Consequently, if the $3x+1$ conjecture is true, most of the positive integers $n$ satisfy $$ \frac{\max_{i\in I}c_i(n)}{\sum_{i\in I}c_i(n)}>\frac16+0.0215. $$

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.