Paper detail

A Noise-Robust Loss for Unlabeled Entity Problem in Named Entity Recognition

Named Entity Recognition (NER) is an important task in natural language processing. However, traditional supervised NER requires large-scale annotated datasets. Distantly supervision is proposed to alleviate the massive demand for datasets, but datasets constructed in this way are extremely noisy and have a serious unlabeled entity problem. The cross entropy (CE) loss function is highly sensitive to unlabeled data, leading to severe performance degradation. As an alternative, we propose a new loss function called NRCES to cope with this problem. A sigmoid term is used to mitigate the negative impact of noise. In addition, we balance the convergence and noise tolerance of the model according to samples and the training process. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach shows strong robustness in the case of severe unlabeled entity problem, achieving new state-of-the-art on real-world datasets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.