Paper detail

A noise independent method of measuring sky location and chirp mass of gravitational waves single sources, using non-simultaneously timing of pulsars

We propose a new method to measure parameters of SMBHBs as individual resolvable evolving single GWs sources, using the timing data of three or more non-simultaneous pulsars. These parameters include the sky position of the SMBHB and a chirp mass-red shift combination M_c(1+z). This method requires both the Earth term and the pulsar terms observed in the power spectra of timing residuals. The method takes only the frequencies values, thus the accuracy of parameters estimation is not dependent with SNR nor the form of timing noises. We applied our method to simulated timing data of three pulsars to check its validity, the GWs sources location can be constrained with an accuracy ΔΩ~800deg^2, the chirp mass can be determined with a relative error of ~50%. Our method works better than previous method, when the size of PTA is small and the SNR of individual pulsar is low, which is likely the case of near future. In case of large array and how SNR in far future, our method can provide good prior parameters distribution for Bayesian inference.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.