Paper detail

A NLTE line formation for neutral and singly-ionised titanium in model atmospheres of the reference A-K stars

We construct a comprehensive model atom for TiI-II using more than 3600 measured and predicted energy levels of TiI and 1800 energy levels of TiII, and quantum mechanical photoionisation cross-sections. Non-local thermodynamical equilibrium (NLTE) line formation for the two ions of titanium is treated through a wide range of spectral types from A to K, including metal-poor stars with [Fe/H] down to -2.6 dex. NLTE leads to systematically depleted total absorption in the TiI lines and to positive abundance corrections. The magnitude of NLTE abundance corrections is smaller compared to the available literature data for the cool (FGK type) atmospheres. NLTE leads to strengthened TiII lines and to negative NLTE abundance corrections. For the first time, we performed the NLTE calculations for TiI-II in the 6500 K < Teff < 13000 K range. The deviations from LTE grow towards higher effective temperature. For four A type stars we derived the NLTE and LTE abundances from lines of TiI and TiII. In LTE an abundance discrepancy of up to 0.22 dex was obtained between TiI and TiII, and it vanishes in NLTE. For other four A-B stars, with only TiII lines observed, NLTE leads to smaller line-to-line scatter compared to LTE. An efficiency of inelastic TiI + HI collisions was empirically estimated from analysis of TiI and TiII lines in 17 cool stars in a wide metallicity range -2.6 < [Fe/H] < 0.0. Consistent NLTE abundances from lines of TiI and TiII were obtained applying classical Drawinian rates for the stars with log g > 4.1, and neglecting inelastic collisions with HI for the VMP giant HD 122563. For the very metal-poor turn-off stars ([Fe/H] < -2 and log g < 4.1), the abundance difference TiI-TiII was obtained to be positive already in LTE and it increases in NLTE. The accurate collisional data for TiI and TiII are desired to find a clue to this problem.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.