Paper detail

A new visit to the variable stars in M56 and its colour magnitude diagram structure

We present a $VI$ CCD photometric study and a membership analysis of the globular cluster M56 (NGC 6779). This produced a decontaminated CMD from field stars, which enabled a better confrontation with theoretical isochrones; Zero-Age Horizontal Branches (ZAHB) and post-ZAHB evolutionary tracks. Post He-flash evolutionary models with a He-core mass of 0.5 M$_\odot$ and envelopes of 0.04 - 0.18 M$_\odot$, cover the complete Horizontal Branch. Models with total mass $\sim$ 0.68 M$_\odot$ explain the RR Lyrae, while those with a mass $\sim$ 0.56 M$_\odot$ and a very subtle envelope, explain the Pop II cepheids with a progenitor in the blue tail of the HB. %Using the mean $(V-I)$ at minimum color curve for the RRab stars, we derived a value for the reddening of $E(B-V)$ = 0.26 $\pm$ 0.02. Based on the Fourier decomposition of the $V$ light curve of a single cluster member RRc star, we determined a metallicity of $\rm [Fe/H]_{ ZW}$ = -1.96 $\pm$ 0.09. Several independent distance determination approaches lead to a mean distance to M56 of $\big< d \big>$ = 9.4 $\pm$ 0.4 kpc. Finally, we report 5 new variables: 1 SX Phe, 3 EB, and 1 RRc.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.