Paper detail

A new take on the low-mass brown dwarf companions on wide-orbits in Upper-Scorpius

The Upper-Scorpius association (5-11 Myr) contains a unique population of low-mass (M<30 MJup) brown-dwarfs. The detailed relative characterization of their physical properties (mass, radius, temperature, composition, ongoing accretion) offers the opportunity to potentially explore their origin and their mechanisms of formation. We aim at characterizing the chemical and physical properties of three young, late-M brown-dwarfs claimed to be companions of the Upper-Scorpius stars USco161031.9-16191305, HIP77900, and HIP78530 using medium resolution spectroscopy at UV (R~3300), optical (R~5400), and near-infrared (R~4300) wavelengths. The spectra of six free-floating analogues from the same association are analyzed for comparison and to explore the potential physical differences between these substellar objects. We also aim at analyzing emission lines at UV and optical wavelengths to investigate the presence of ongoing accretion processes. The X-Shooter spectrograph at VLT was used to obtain the spectra of our targets over the 0.3-2.5 $μ$m range simultaneously. Performing a forward modelling of the observed spectra with the ForMoSA code (Nested Sampling Bayesian inference method in using BT-SETTL15 models), we infer the Teff, log(g), and radius of our objects. Our results are compatible with physical parameters found for free floating analogues of the association and with evolutionary-model predictions. However the final accuracy on the Teff estimates is strongly limited by non-reproducibilities of the BT-SETTL15 models for late-M brown-dwarfs. We identified emission lines in the spectrum of several objects attributed to chromospheric activity except for USco1608-2315 for which they are indicative of active accretion. We confirm the x4 over-luminosity of USco161031.9-16191305B. It could be explained by the object activity and if the companion is an unresolved multiple system.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.