Paper detail

A new simple dynamo model for stellar activity cycle

A new simple dynamo model for stellar activity cycle is proposed. By considering an inhomogeneous mean flow effect on turbulence, it is shown that turbulent cross helicity (velocity--magnetic-field correlation) should enter the expression of turbulent electromotive force as the coupling coefficient for the mean absolute vorticity. The inclusion of the cross-helicity effect makes the present model different from the current $α$--$Ω$-type models mainly in two points. First, in addition to the usual $α$ (helicity effect) and $β$ (turbulent magnetic diffusivity), we consider the $γ$ coefficient (cross-helicity effect) as a key ingredient of the dynamo process. Second, unlike the $α$ and $β$ coefficients, which are often treated as an adjustable parameter in the current studies, the spatiotemporal evolution of $γ$ coefficient is solved simultaneously with the mean magnetic-field equations. The basic scenario is as follows: In the presence of turbulent cross helicity, the toroidal field is induced by the toroidal rotation in mediation by the turbulent cross helicity. The $α$ effect generates the poloidal field from the toroidal one. This poloidal field produces a turbulent cross helicity whose sign is opposite to the original one. Then a cycle of reversal completes. Eigenvalue analyses of the simplest possible present model give a butterfly diagram, which confirms the above scenario as well as the equator-ward migrations, the phase relationship between the cross helicity and magnetic fields, etc. These results suggest that the oscillation of the turbulent cross helicity is a key for the activity cycle. The reversal of the turbulent cross helicity is not the result of the magnetic-field reversal, but the cause of the latter. This new model is expected to open up the possibility of the mean-field or turbulence closure dynamo approaches.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.