Paper detail

A New Sedimentation Model for Greater Cloud Diversity in Giant Exoplanets and Brown Dwarfs

The observed atmospheric spectrum of exoplanets and brown dwarfs depends critically on the presence and distribution of atmospheric condensates. The Ackerman & Marley (2001) methodology for predicting the vertical distribution of condensate particles is widely used to study cloudy atmospheres and has recently been implemented in an open-source python package virga. The model relies upon input parameter $f_{\text{sed}}$, the sedimentation efficiency, which until now has been held constant. The relative simplicity of this model renders it useful for retrieval studies due to its rapidly attainable solutions. However, comparisons with more complex microphysical models such as CARMA have highlighted inconsistencies between the two approaches, namely that the cloud parameters needed for radiative transfer produced by virga are dissimilar to those produced by CARMA. To address these discrepancies, we have extended the original Ackerman and Marley methodology in virga to allow for non-constant $f_{\text{sed}}$ values, in particular those that vary with altitude. We discuss one such parameterization and compare the cloud mass mixing ratio produced by virga with constant and variable $f_{\text{sed}}$ profiles to that produced by CARMA. We find that the variable $f_{\text{sed}}$ formulation better captures the profile produced by CARMA with heterogeneous nucleation, yet performs comparatively to constant $f_{\text{sed}}$ for homogeneous nucleation. In general, virga has the capacity to handle any $f_{\text{sed}}$ with an explicit anti-derivative, permitting a plethora of alternative cloud profiles that are otherwise unattainable by constant $f_{\text{sed}}$ values. The ensuing flexibility has the potential to better agree with increasingly complex models and observed data.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.