Paper detail

A New Reddening Law for M4

We have used a combination of broad-band near-infrared and optical Johnson-Cousins photometry to study the dust properties in the line of sight to the Galactic globular cluster M4. We have investigated the reddening effects in terms of absolute strength and variation across the cluster field, as well as the form of the reddening law defined by the type of dust. Here, we determine the ratio of absolute to selective extinction (R_V) in the line of sight towards M4, which is known to be a useful indicator for the type of dust and therefore characterizes the applicable reddening law. Our method is independent of age assumptions and appears to be significantly more precise and accurate than previous approaches. We obtain A_V/E(B-V)=3.76\pm0.07 (random error) for the dust in the line of sight to M4 for our set of filters. With this value, the distance to M4 is found to be 1.80\pm0.05 kpc (random error). A reddening map for M4 has been created, which reveals a spatial differential reddening of delta E(B-V)>0.2 mag across a field within 10' around the cluster centre and a total mean reddening of E(B-V)=0.37\pm0.01. In order to provide accurate zero points for the extinction coefficients of our photometric filters, we investigated the impact of stellar parameters such as temperature, surface gravity and metallicity on the extinction properties in different bandpasses. Using both synthetic ATLAS9 spectra and observed spectral energy distributions, we found similar sized effects for the range of temperature, surface gravity, and metallicity typical of globular cluster stars: each causes a change of about 3% in the necessary correction factor for each filter combination. From our calculations, we provide extinction zero points for Johnson-Cousins and 2MASS filters, spanning a wide range of stellar parameters and dust types, suited for accurate, object-specific extinction corrections.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.