Paper detail

A new proof of Harish-Chandra's integral formula

We present a new proof of Harish-Chandra's formula $$Π(h_1) Π(h_2) \int_G e^{\langle \mathrm{Ad}_g h_1, h_2 \rangle} dg = \frac{ [ \! [ Π, Π] \!] }{|W|} \sum_{w \in W} ε(w) e^{\langle w(h_1),h_2 \rangle},$$ where $G$ is a compact, connected, semisimple Lie group, $dg$ is normalized Haar measure, $h_1$ and $h_2$ lie in a Cartan subalgebra of the complexified Lie algebra, $Π$ is the discriminant, $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ is the Killing form, $[ \! [ \cdot, \cdot ] \!]$ is an inner product that extends the Killing form to polynomials, $W$ is a Weyl group, and $ε(w)$ is the sign of $w \in W$. The proof in this paper follows from a relationship between heat flow on a semisimple Lie algebra and heat flow on a Cartan subalgebra, extending methods developed by Itzykson and Zuber for the case of an integral over the unitary group $U(N)$. The heat-flow proof allows a systematic approach to studying the asymptotics of orbital integrals over a wide class of groups.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.