Paper detail

A New Probe of Gaussianity and Isotropy applied to the CMB Maps

We introduce a new mathematical tool (a direction-dependent probe) to analyse the randomness of purported isotropic Gaussian random fields on the sphere. We apply the probe to assess the full-sky cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature maps produced by the {\it Planck} collaboration (PR2 2015 and PR3 2018), with special attention to the inpainted maps. To study the randomness of the fields represented by each map we use the autocorrelation of the sequence of probe coefficients (which are just the full-sky Fourier coefficients $a_{\ell,0}$ if the $z$ axis is taken in the probe direction). If the field is {isotropic and Gaussian} then the probe coefficients for a given direction should be realisations of uncorrelated scalar Gaussian random variables. We introduce a particular function on the sphere (called the \emph{AC discrepancy}) that accentuates the departure from Gaussianity and isotropy. We find that for some of the maps, there are many directions for which the departures are significant, especially near the galactic plane. We also study the effect of varying the highest multipole used to calculate the AC discrepancy from the initial value of $1500$ to $2500$. In the case of Commander 2015, the AC discrepancy now exhibits antipodal "blobs" well away from the galactic plane. Finally, we look briefly at the non-inpainted Planck maps, for which the computed AC discrepancy maps have a very different character, with features that are global rather than local. For the particular case of the non-inpainted 2018 \texttt{SEVEM} map (which has visible equatorial pollution), we model with partial success the observed behaviour by an isotropic Gaussian random field added to a non-random needlet-like structure located near the galactic centre.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.