Paper detail

A new parton model for the soft interactions at high energies: two channel approximation

The primary goal of this paper is to describe the diffraction production using the model that takes into account the Pomeron interaction, and satisfies both $t$ and $s$ channel unitarity. We hope that these features will allow us to describe the diffraction production in a more convenient way than in CGC motivated models, that do not satisfy these unitarity constraints. Unfortunately, we show that both approaches are only able to describe half of the cross section for the single diffraction production, leaving the second half to be estimate of the large mass production in the Pomeron approach.The impact parameter dependance of the scattering amplitudes show that soft interactions at high energies measured at the LHC, have a much richer structure than presumed. We discuss the $t$-dependence of the elastic cross section in wide range of $|t|=0 ÷1 \,GeV^2 $. We show that in the kinemati region of the minimum, we cannot use approximate formulae to calculate the real part of the amplitude. The exact calculation in our model, shows that the real part is rather small, and it is necessary to include the Odderon contribution in order to describe the experimental data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.