Paper detail

A New Optical Survey of Supernova Remnant Candidates in M31

We present a survey of optically emitting supernova remnants (SNRs) in M31 based on H$α$ and [SII] images in the Local Group Survey. Using these images, we select objects that have [SII]:H$α$ $>$ 0.4 and circular shapes. We find 76 new SNR candidates. We also inspect 234 SNR candidates presented in previous studies, finding that only 80 of them are SNR candidates according to our criteria. Combining them with the new candidates, we produce a master catalog of 156 SNR candidates in M31. We classify these SNR candidates according to two criteria: the SNR progenitor type [Type Ia and core-collapse (CC) SNRs] and the morphological type. Type Ia and CC SNR candidates make up 23% and 77%, respectively, of the total sample. Most of the CC SNR candidates are concentrated in the spiral arms, while the Type Ia SNR candidates are rather distributed over the entire galaxy, including the inner region. The CC SNR candidates are brighter in H$α$ and [SII] than the Type Ia SNR candidates. We derive a cumulative size distribution of the SNR candidates, finding that the distribution of the candidates with 17 $< D <$ 50 pc is fitted well by a power law with the power law index $α= 2.53\pm0.04$. This indicates that most of the SNR candidates identified in this study appear to be in the Sedov-Taylor phase. The [SII]:H$α$ distribution of the SNR candidates is bimodal, with peaks at [SII]:H$α$ $\sim$ 0.4 and $\sim$ 0.9. The properties of these SNR candidates vary little with the galactocentric distance. The H$α$ and [SII] surface brightnesses show a good correlation with the X-ray luminosity of the SNR candidates that are center-bright. The SNR candidates with X-ray counterparts have higher surface brightnesses in H$α$ and [SII] and smaller sizes than those without such counterparts.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.