Paper detail

A New Method to Directly Measure the Jeans Scale of the Intergalactic Medium Using Close Quasar Pairs

Although the baryons in the intergalactic medium (IGM) trace dark matter on Mpc scales, small-scale (~100 kpc) fluctuations are suppressed by pressure support, analogous to the classical Jeans argument. This Jeans filtering scale has fundamental cosmological implications: it provides a thermal record of heat injected by UV photons during reionization events, determines the clumpiness of the IGM, and sets the minimum mass scale for gravitational collapse, a key quantity in galaxy formation. Unfortunately, it is extremely challenging to measure via the standard analysis of purely longitudinal Lyman-alpha forest spectra, because the thermal Doppler broadening of absorption lines is highly degenerate with Jeans pressure smoothing. In this work we show that the Jeans scale can be directly measured by characterizing the coherence of correlated Lyman-alpha absorption in quasar pairs with separations small enough to resolve it. We present a novel technique for this purpose, based on the probability distribution function (PDF) of phase angle differences of homologous longitudinal Fourier modes in close quasar pair spectra. A Bayesian formalism is introduced based on the phase angle PDF, and MCMC techniques are used to characterize the precision of a future Jeans scale measurement, and explore degeneracies with other thermal parameters governing the IGM. A semi-analytical model of the IGM is used to generate a grid of 500 thermal models from a dark matter simulation. Our full parameter study indicates that a realistic sample of only 20 close quasar pair spectra can pinpoint the Jeans scale to ~ 5% precision, independent of the parameters governing the temperature-density relation of the IGM. We show that this new method is insensitive to a battery of systematics such as continuum fitting errors, imprecise knowledge of the noise and spectral resolution, and metal-line absorption.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.