Paper detail

A New Method for Estimating Starspot Lifetimes Based on Autocorrelation Functions

We present a method that utilizes autocorrelation functions from long-term precision broadband differential light curves to estimate the average lifetimes of starspot groups for two large sample of Kepler stars: stars with and without previously known rotation periods. Our method is calibrated by comparing the strengths of the first few normalized autocorrelation peaks using ensembles of models that have various starspot lifetimes. We find that we must mix models of short and long lifetimes together (in heuristically determined ratios) to align the models with the Kepler data. Our fundamental result is that short starspot group lifetimes (1-4 rotations) are implied when the first normalized peak is weaker than about 0.4, long lifetimes (15 or greater) are implied when it is greater than about 0.7, and in between are the intermediate cases. Rotational lifetimes can be converted to physical lifetimes if the rotation period is known. Stars with shorter rotation periods tend to have longer rotational (but not physical) spot lifetimes, and cooler stars tend to have longer physical spot lifetimes than warmer stars with the same rotation period. The distributions of the physical lifetimes are lognormal for both samples and generally longer in the first sample. The shorter lifetimes in the stars without known periods probably explain why their periods are difficult to measure. Some stars exhibit longer than average physical starspot lifetimes; their percentage drops with increasing temperature from nearly half at 3000K to nearly zero for hotter than 6000K.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.