Paper detail

A new magnitude-dependent ETAS model for earthquakes

We propose a new version of the ETAS model, which we also analyze theoretically. As for the standard ETAS model, we assume the Gutenberg-Richter law as a probability density function for background events' magnitude. Instead, the magnitude of triggered shocks is assumed to be probabilistically dependent on the triggering events' magnitude. To this aim, we propose a suitable probability density function. This function is such that, averaging on all triggering events' magnitudes, we obtain again the Gutenberg-Richter law. This ensures the validity of this law at any event's generation when ignoring past seismicity. The probabilistic dependence between the magnitude of triggered events' and the one of the corresponding triggering shock is motivated by some results of a statistical analysis of some Italian catalogues. The proposed model has been also theoretically analyzed here. In particular, we focus on the inter-event time which plays a very important role in the assessment of seismic hazard. Using the tool of the probability generating function and the Palm theory, we derive the density of inter-event time for small values.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.