Paper detail

A New Look At Neutrino Limits From Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

We take a fresh look at the limits on the number of neutrino flavors derived from big bang nucleosynthesis. In particular, recent measurements of the \he4 abundance enable one to estimate the primordial \he4 mass fraction at $Y_p = 0.232 \pm .003(stat) \pm .005(syst)$. For a baryon to photon ratio, $η$, consistent with the other light elements, this leads to a best fit for the number of neutrino flavors $N_ν< 3$ (the precise number depends on $η$) indicating a very strong upper limit to $N_ν$. Here, we derive new upper limits on $N_ν$, paying special attention to the fact that the best estimate may lie in an unphysical region ($N_ν< 3$ if all three neutrino flavors are light or massless; the lower bound to $N_ν$ may even be as low as 2, if the small window for a $ν_τ$ mass is exploited.) Our resulting upper limits therefore depend on whether $N_ν\ge 2$ or 3 is assumed. We also explore the sensitivity of our results to the adopted value of $η$ and the assumed systematic errors in $Y_p$.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.