Paper detail

A new light on the breaking of uniaxial symmetry in nematics

Within the Landau-de Gennes theory of liquid crystals, we study theoretically the equilibrium configurations with uniaxial symmetry. For an arbitrary form of the bulk energy density, we show that energy minimizers among uniaxially symmetric configurations are usually not equilibrium configurations. It was known before that uniaxiality can sometimes be broken by energy minimizers. We prove here that this is always the case in one or two dimensions. Even more we prove that equilibrium configurations (not only minimizers) cannot be uniaxial in one or two dimensions (unless they are constant). Namely, uniaxial equilibrium configurations with at least one translational invariance direction must have a uniform director field. In the case of a hybrid nematic cell, or of a capillary with radial anchoring, our result implies that biaxial escape always occurs, and that it does so not only in the core of a defect: uniaxial order is destroyed in the whole cell.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.