Paper detail

A new large CMB non-Gaussian anomaly and its alignment with cosmic structure

We provide evidence of the detection of a new non-Gaussian anomaly in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation which has larger statistical significance than the Cold Spot (CS) anomaly and comparable size. This temperature anomaly is aligned with a huge large quasar group (HLQG), and for this reason we call it HLQG anomaly. There are different physical phenomena by which the HLQG could have produced the observed temperature anomaly, such as for example the Sunyaev Zeldovich (SZ), the integrated Sachs Wolfe (ISW) or the Rees Sciama (RS) effect. The goal of this paper it is not to explain the observed alignment in terms of these effects, but to show the shape and position of the HLQG anomaly, and estimate its statistical significance, i.e. the probability that it could be just the result of primordial Gaussian fluctuations. We analyze the CMB Planck satellite temperature map of the region of sky corresponding to the angular position of the HLQG, and compute an inner and an outer temperature by averaging the CMB map over respectively the region subtended by the HLQG on the sky, and over a region surrounding it. It turns out that the inner region is warmer than the outer one, with a measured temperature difference of $ΔT^{obs} \approx 43μK$. The temperature excess is then compared with the results of Montecarlo simulations of random Gaussian realizations of the CMB map, indicating with at least a $2.3σ$ confidence level, that the measured $ΔT^{obs}$ cannot be attributed to primordial Gaussian fluctuations. Its alignment with HLQG and suggests that this could be due to the Rees-Sciama effect. Our results are stable under the choice of different simulations methods and different definitions of the inner and outer regions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.