Paper detail

A New Lagrangian Problem Crossover: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Crossover Standards

The performance of most evolutionary metaheuristic algorithms relays on various operatives. One of them is the crossover operator, which is divided into two types: application dependent and application independent crossover operators. These standards always help to choose the best-fitted point in the evolutionary algorithm process. High efficiency of crossover operators allows engineers to minimize errors in engineering application optimization while saving time and avoiding costly. There are two crucial objectives behind this paper; at first, it is an overview of crossover standards classification that has been used by researchers for solving engineering operations and problem representation. The second objective of this paper; The significance of novel standard crossover is proposed depending on Lagrangian Dual Function (LDF) to progress the formulation of the Lagrangian Problem Crossover (LPX) as a new standard of systematic operator. The proposed crossover standards result for 100 generations of parent chromosomes are compared to the BX and SBX standards, which are the communal real-coded crossover standards. The accuracy and performance of the proposed standard have evaluated by three unimodal test functions. Besides, the proposed standard results are statistically demonstrated and proved that it has an excessive ability to generate and enhance the novel optimization algorithm compared to BX and SBX

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.