Paper detail

A New Interpretation of Three-Dimensional Particle Geometry: M-A-V-L

This study provides a new interpretation of 3D particle geometry that unravels the 'interrelation' of the four geometry parameters, i.e., morphology M, surface area A, volume V, and size L, for which a new formula, M = A/V$\times$L/6, is introduced to translate the 3D particle morphology as a function of surface area, volume, and size. The A/V$\times$L of a sphere is invariably 6, which is placed in the denominator of the formula, and therefore M indicates a relative morphological irregularity compared to the sphere. The minimum possible value of M is clearly one, and M may range approximately to three for coarse-grained mineral particles. Furthermore, the proposed formula, M = A/V$\times$L/6, enables to graphically preserve the four parameters' relations when plotting the geometry parameter distributions. This study demonstrates the approach with two plot spaces that represent (i) L vs. M and (ii) A/V vs. V, where A/V works as the messenger between these two spaces as A/V = M/L$\times$6. Therefore, this approach helps comprehensively address the four-dimensional aspects of the 3D particle geometry and better understand the parameters' combined influence on the mechanical behavior of granular materials. Keywords: 3D particle geometry; Morphology; Surface area; Volume; Size;

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.