Paper detail

A new infrared color criterion for the selection of 0<z<7 AGN: application to deep fields and implications for JWST surveys

[Abridged] It is widely accepted that observations at mid-infrared (mid-IR) wavelengths enable the selection of galaxies with nuclear activity, which may not be revealed even in the deepest X-ray surveys. In this work new near- and mid-IR color diagnostics are explored, aiming for improved efficiency - better completeness and less contamination - in selecting AGN out to very high redshifts. We restrict our study to the James Webb Space Telescope wavelength range (0.6-27um). The criteria are created based on the predictions by state-of-the-art galaxy and AGN templates covering a wide variety of galaxy properties, and tested against control samples with deep multi-wavelength coverage (ranging from the X-rays to radio frequencies). We show that the colors Ks-[4.5], [4.5]-[8.0], and [8.0]-[24] are ideal as AGN/non-AGN diagnostics at, respectively, z<~1, 1<~z<~2.5, and z>~2.5-3. However, when the source redshift is unknown, these colors should be combined. We thus develop an improved IR criterion (using Ks and IRAC bands, KI) as a new alternative at z<~2.5. KI does not show improved completeness (50-60% overall) in comparison to commonly used IRAC-based AGN criteria, but is less affected by non-AGN contamination (revealing a >50-90% level of successful AGN selection). We also propose KIM (using Ks, IRAC, and MIPS-24um bands, KIM), which aims to select AGN hosts from local distances to as far back as the end of reionization (0<z<~7) with reduced non-AGN contamination. However, the necessary testing-constraints and the small control-sample sizes prevent the confirmation of its improved efficiency at z<~2.5. Overall, KIM shows a ~30-40% completeness and a >70-90% level of successful AGN selection. KI and KIM are built to be reliable against a ~10-20% error in flux, are based on existing filters, and are suitable for immediate use.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.