Paper detail

A new fundamental plane for radiatively efficient black-hole sources

In recent years, it was found that there are several low/hard state of X-ray binaries (XRBs) follow an `outliers' track of radio--X-ray correlation ($L_{\rm R}\propto L_{\rm X}^{b}$ and $b\sim1.4$), which is much steeper than the former universal track with $b\sim0.6$. In this work, we compile a sample of bright radio-quiet active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and find that their hard X-ray photon indices and Eddington ratios are positively correlated, which is similar to that of `outliers' of XRBs, where both bright AGNs and `outliers' of XRBs have bolometric Eddington ratios $\gtrsim1%L_{\rm Edd}$ ($L_{\rm Edd}$ is Eddington luminosity). The Eddington-scaled radio--X-ray correlation of these AGNs is also similar to that of `outliers' of XRBs, which has a form of $L_{\rm 5 GHz}/L_{\rm Edd}\propto (L_{\rm 2-10 keV}/L_{\rm Edd})^{c}$ with $c\simeq1.59$ and 1.53 for AGNs and XRBs respectively. Both the positively correlated X-ray spectral evolution and the steeper radio--X-ray correlation can be regulated by a radiatively efficient accretion flow (e.g., disk-corona). Based on these similarities, we further present a new fundamental plane for `outliers' of XRBs and bright AGNs in black-hole (BH) mass, radio and X-ray luminosity space: $\log L_{\rm R}=1.59^{+0.28}_{-0.22} \log L_{\rm X}- 0.22^{+0.19}_{-0.20}\log M_{\rm BH}-28.97^{+0.45}_{-0.45}$ with a scatter of $σ_{\rm R}=0.51\rm dex$. This fundamental plane is suitable for radiatively efficient BH sources, while the former plane proposed by Merloni et al. and Falcke et al. may be most suitable for radiatively inefficient sources.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.