Paper detail

A new `dinv' arising from the two part case of the Shuffle Conjecture

In a recent paper J. Haglund showed that a certain symmetric function expresion enumerates by t^{area} q^{dinv} of the parking functions whose diagonal word is in the shuffle of 12...j and j+1...j+n with k of the cars j+1,...,j+n in the main diagonal including car j+n in the cell (1,1). In view of some recent conjectures of Haglund-Morse-Zabrocki it is natural to conjecture that replacing E_{n,k} by the modified Hall-Littlewood functions would yield a polynomial that enumerates the same collection of parking functions but now restricted by the requirement that the Dyck path supporting cars j+1,...,j+n hits the diagonal according to the composition p=(p_1,p_2,...,p_k). We prove here this conjecture by deriving a recursion for the symmetric function expression then using this recursion to construct a new dinv statistic we will denote ndinv and show that this polynomial enumerates the latter parking functions by t^{area} q^{ndinv}.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.