Paper detail

A new class of probabilities in the n-person red-and-black game

We discuss a model of a $N$-person, non-cooperative stochastic game, inspired by the discrete version of the red-and-black gambling problem introduced by Dubins and Savage in 1965. Our main theorem generalizes a result of Pontiggia from 2007 which provides conditions upon which bold strategies for all players form a Nash equilibrium. Our tool is a functional inequality introduced and discussed in the present paper. It allows us to avoid rather restrictive assumptions of super-multiplicativity and super-additivity, which appear in Pontiggia's and other authors' works. We terminate the paper with some examples which in particular show that our approach leads to a larger class of probability functions than existed in the literature so far.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.