Paper detail

A New Bound on the Performance of the Bandwidth Puzzle

A bandwidth puzzle was recently proposed to defend against colluding adversaries in peer-to-peer networks. The colluding adversaries do not do actual work but claim to have uploaded contents for each other to gain free credits from the system. The bandwidth puzzle guarantees that if the adversaries can solve the puzzle, they must have spent substantial bandwidth, the size of which is comparable to the size of the contents they claim to have uploaded for each other. Therefore, the puzzle discourages the collusion. In this paper, we study the performance of the bandwidth puzzle and give a lower bound on the average number of bits the adversaries must receive to be able to solve the puzzles with a certain probability. We show that our bound is tight in the sense that there exists a strategy to approach this lower bound asymptotically within a small factor. The new bound gives better security guarantees than the existing bound, and can be used to guide better choices of puzzle parameters to improve the system performance.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.