Paper detail

A New Approach to Population Sizing for Memetic Algorithms: A Case Study for the Multidimensional Assignment Problem

Memetic Algorithms are known to be a powerful technique in solving hard optimization problems. To design a memetic algorithm one needs to make a host of decisions; selecting a population size is one of the most important among them. Most algorithms in the literature fix the population size to a certain constant value. This reduces the algorithm's quality since the optimal population size varies for different instances, local search procedures and running times. In this paper we propose an adjustable population size. It is calculated as a function of the running time of the whole algorithm and the average running time of the local search for the given instance. Note that in many applications the running time of a heuristic should be limited and therefore we use this limit as a parameter of the algorithm. The average running time of the local search procedure is obtained during the algorithm's run. Some coefficients which are independent with respect to the instance or the local search are to be tuned before the algorithm run; we provide a procedure to find these coefficients. The proposed approach was used to develop a memetic algorithm for the Multidimensional Assignment Problem (MAP or s-AP in the case of s dimensions) which is an extension of the well-known assignment problem. MAP is NP-hard and has a host of applications. We show that using adjustable population size makes the algorithm flexible to perform well for instances of very different sizes and types and for different running times and local searches. This allows us to select the most efficient local search for every instance type. The results of computational experiments for several instance families and sizes prove that the proposed algorithm performs efficiently for a wide range of the running times and clearly outperforms the state-of-the art 3-AP memetic algorithm being given the same time.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.