Paper detail

A necessary and sufficient instability condition for inviscid shear flow

The linear stability of inviscid, incompressible, two-dimensional, plane parallel, shear flow was considered over a century ago by Rayleigh, Kelvin, and others. A principal result on the subject is Rayleigh's celebrated inflection point theorem {R80}, which states that for an equilibrium flow to be unstable, the equilibrium velocity profile must contain an inflection point. That is, if the velocity profile is given by $U(y)$, where $y$ is the cross-stream coordinate, then there must be a point, $y=y_I$, for which $U''(y_I)=0$. Much later, in 1950, Fjørtoft {F50} generalized the theorem by showing that, moreover, if there is one inflection point, then $U'''(y_I)/U'(y_I)<0$ is required for instability (see {Bar} for further extensions). Both Rayleigh's Theorem and Fjørtoft's subsequent generalization are necessary conditions for instability, but they are not sufficient. That is, even though an equilibrium profile may contain a vorticity minimum, it is not necessarily unstable. The point of this paper is to derive, for a large class of equilibrium velocity profiles, a condition that is necessary and sufficient for instability.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.