Paper detail

A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Existence of a Positive Perron Vector

In 1907, Oskar Perron showed that a positive square matrix has a unique largest positive eigenvalue with a positive eigenvector. This result was extended to irreducible nonnegative matrices by Geog Frobenius in 1912, and to irreducible nonnegative tensors and weakly irreducible nonnegative tensors recently. This result is a fundamental result in matrix theory and has found wide applications in probability theory, internet search engines, spectral graph and hypergraph theory, etc. In this paper, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of such a positive eigenvector, i.e., a positive Perron vector, for a nonnegative tensor. We show that every nonnegative tensor has a canonical nonnegative partition form, from which we introduce strongly nonnegative tensors. A tensor is called strongly nonnegative, if the spectral radius of each genuine weakly irreducible block is equal to the spectral radius of the tensor, which is strictly larger than the spectral radius of any other block. We prove that a nonnegative tensor has a positive Perron vector if and only if it is strongly nonnegative. The proof is nontrivial. Numerical results for finding a positive Perron vector are reported.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.