Paper detail

A multiplicity study of transiting exoplanet host stars. I. High-contrast imaging with VLT/SPHERE

We study the multiplicity of host stars to known transiting extra-solar planets to test competing theories on the formation mechanisms of hot Jupiters. We observed 45 exoplanet host stars using VLT/SPHERE/IRDIS to search for potential companions. For each identified candidate companion we determined the probability that it is gravitationally bound to its host by performing common proper motion checks and modelling of synthetic stellar populations around the host. We detected new candidate companions around K2-38, WASP-72, WASP-80, WASP-87, WASP-88, WASP-108, WASP-118, WASP-120, WASP-122, WASP123, WASP-130, WASP-131 and WASP-137. The closest candidates were detected at separations of $0.124''\pm0.007''$ and $0.189''\pm0.003''$ around WASP-108 and WASP-131; the measured $K$ band contrasts indicate that these are stellar companions of $0.35\pm0.02\,M_{\odot}$ and $0.62^{+0.05}_{-0.04}\,M_{\odot}$, respectively. Including the re-detection and confirmation of previously known companions in 13 other systems we derived a multiplicity fraction of $55.4^{+5.9}_{-9.4}\,\%$. For the representative sub-sample of 40 hot Jupiter host stars among our targets, the derived multiplicity rate is $54.8^{+6.3}_{-9.9}\,\%$. Our data do not confirm any trend that systems with eccentric planetary companions are preferably part of multiple systems. On average, we reached a magnitude contrast of $8.5\pm0.9$ mag at an angular separation of 0.5''. This allows to exclude additional stellar companions with masses larger than $0.08$ M$_\odot$ for almost all observed systems; around the closest and youngest systems this sensitivity is achieved at physical separations as small as 10 au. The presented study shows that SPHERE is an ideal instrument to detect and characterize close companions to exoplanetary host stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.