Paper detail

A multipartite analogue of Dilworth's Theorem

We prove that every partially ordered set on $n$ elements contains $k$ subsets $A_{1},A_{2},\dots,A_{k}$ such that either each of these subsets has size $Ω(n/k^{5})$ and, for every $i<j$, every element in $A_{i}$ is less than or equal to every element in $A_{j}$, or each of these subsets has size $Ω(n/(k^{2}\log n))$ and, for every $i \not = j$, every element in $A_{i}$ is incomparable with every element in $A_{j}$ for $i\ne j$. This answers a question of the first author from 2006. As a corollary, we prove for each positive integer $h$ there is $C_h$ such that for any $h$ partial orders $<_{1},<_{2},\dots,<_{h}$ on a set of $n$ elements, there exists $k$ subsets $A_{1},A_{2},\dots,A_{k}$ each of size at least $n/(k\log n)^{C_{h}}$ such that for each partial order $<_{\ell}$, either $a_{1}<_{\ell}a_{2}<_{\ell}\dots<_{\ell}a_{k}$ for any tuple of elements $(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_k) \in A_1\times A_2\times \dots \times A_k$, or $a_{1}>_{\ell}a_{2}>_{\ell}\dots>_{\ell}a_{k}$ for any $(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_k) \in A_1\times A_2\times \dots \times A_k$, or $a_i$ is incomparable with $a_j$ for any $i\ne j$, $a_i\in A_i$ and $a_j\in A_j$. This improves on a 2009 result of Pach and the first author motivated by problems in discrete geometry.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.