Abstract

We present a multi-wavelength, UV-to-radio analysis for a sample of massive (M∗_{\ast} ∼\sim 1010^{10} M⊙_\odot) IRAC- and MIPS 24μμm-detected Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) with spectroscopic redshifts z∼\sim3 in the GOODS-North field (LUV_{\rm UV}>1.8×>1.8\timesLz=3∗^{\ast}_{z=3}). For LBGs without individual 24μμm detections, we employ stacking techniques at 24μμm, 1.1mm and 1.4GHz, to construct the average UV-to-radio spectral energy distribution and find it to be consistent with that of a Luminous Infrared Galaxy (LIRG) with LIR\rm_{IR}=4.5−2.3+1.1^{+1.1}_{-2.3}×1011\times 10^{11} L⊙_{\odot} and a specific star formation rate (SSFR) of 4.3 Gyr−1^{-1} that corresponds to a mass doubling time ∼\sim230 Myrs. On the other hand, when considering the 24μμm-detected LBGs we find among them galaxies with LIR>1012\rm_{IR}> 10^{12} L⊙_{\odot}, indicating that the space density of z∼z\sim3 UV-selected Ultra-luminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs) is ∼\sim(1.5±\pm0.5)×10−5\times 10^{-5} Mpc−3^{-3}. We compare measurements of star formation rates (SFRs) from data at different wavelengths and find that there is tight correlation (Kendall's τ>τ> 99.7%) and excellent agreement between the values derived from dust-corrected UV, mid-IR, mm and radio data for the whole range of LIR\rm_{IR} up to LIR\rm_{IR} ∼\sim 1013^{13} L⊙_{\odot}. This range is greater than that for which the correlation is known to hold at z∼\sim2, possibly due to the lack of significant contribution from PAHs to the 24μμm flux at z∼z\sim3. The fact that this agreement is observed for galaxies with LIR\rm_{IR} >> 1012^{12} L⊙_{\odot} suggests that star-formation in UV-selected ULIRGs, as well as the bulk of star-formation activity at this redshift, is not embedded in optically thick regions as seen in local ULIRGs and submillimeter-selected galaxies at z=2z=2.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.