Paper detail

A multi-wavelength approach to the properties of Extremely Red Galaxy populations: I - Contribution to the Star Formation Rate density and AGN content

We present a multi-wavelength analysis of the properties of Extremely Red Galaxy (ERG) populations, selected in the GOODS-South/Chandra Deep Field South field. By using all the photometric and spectroscopic information available on large deep samples of EROs (645 sources), IEROs (294 sources), and DRGs (350 sources), we derive redshift distributions, identify AGN powered and Star-formation powered galaxies, and, using the radio observations of this field, estimate robust (AGN- and dust-unbiased) Star Formation Rate Densities (SFRD) for these populations. We also investigate the properties of "pure" (galaxies that conform to only one of the three ERG criteria considered) and "combined" (galaxies that verify all three criteria) sub-populations. Overall, a large number of AGN are identified (up to ~30%, based on X-rays, and mid-infrared criteria), the majority of which are type-2 (obscured) objects. Among ERGs with no evidence for AGN activity, we identify sub-populations covering a wide range of average star-formation rates, from below 10 Mo/yr to as high as 200 Mo/yr. Applying a redshift separation (1<z<2 and 2<z<3) we find significant evolution (an increase of a factor of 2 or higher) of SFRD for EROs and DRGs, while none is observed for IEROs. The former populations can contribute more than 20\% to the global SFRD at 2<z<3. The emission from AGN activity is typically not strong in the ERG population, with AGN increasing the average radio luminosity of ERG sub-populations by, nominally, less than 20%. AGN are common, however, and, if no discrimination is attempted, this could significantly increase the SFRD estimate (by over 100% in some cases). Thus, and while the contribution of star forming processes to the radio luminosity in galaxies with AGN remains uncertain, a comprehensive identification of AGN in these populations is necessary to obtain meaningful results.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.