Paper detail

A multi-scale kinetic inviscid flux extracted from the gas-kinetic scheme for simulating incompressible and compressible flows

A Kinetic Inviscid Flux (KIF) is proposed for simulating incompressible and compressible flows. It is constructed based on the direct modeling of multi-scale flow behaviors, which is used in the Gas-Kinetic Scheme (GKS), the Unified Gas-Kinetic Scheme (UGKS), the Discrete Unified Gas-Kinetic Scheme (DUGKS), etc.. In KIF, the discontinuities (such as the shock wave) that can not be well resolved by mesh cells are mainly solved by the Kinetic Flux Vector Splitting (KFVS) method representing the free transport mechanism (or micro-scale mechanism), while in other flow regions that are smooth, the flow behavior is solved mainly by the central-scheme-like Totally Thermalized Transport (TTT). The weights of KFVS and TTT in KIF is automatically determined by those in the theory of direct modeling. Two ways of choosing the weights in KIF are proposed, which are actually the weights adopted in the UGKS and the DUGKS, respectively. By using the test cases of Sod shock tube, rarefaction wave, the boundary layer of flat plate, the cavity flow and hypersonic flow over circular cylinder, the validity and accuracy of the present method are examined. The KIF does not suffer from the carbuncle phenomenon, and does not introduce extra numerical viscosity in smooth regions. Especially, in the case of hypersonic cylinder, it gives a quite sharp and clear density and temperature contours. The KIF can be viewed as an inviscid-viscous splitting version of the GKS. By the doing this splitting, it is easy to be used in the traditional CFD frameworks. It can also be classified as a new type in the numerical schemes based on the kinetic theory that are represented by the works in Ref. \cite{SunA} and Ref. \cite{ohwada2018a}, except the weights are determined by the weights of direct modeling.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.