Paper detail

A multi-plank generalization of the Bang and Kadets inequalities

If a convex body $K \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is covered by the union of convex bodies $C_1, \ldots, C_N$, multiple subadditivity questions can be asked. Two classical results regard the subadditivity of the width (the smallest distance between two parallel hyperplanes that sandwich $K$) and the inradius (the largest radius of a ball contained in $K$): the sum of the widths of the $C_i$ is at least the width of $K$ (this is the plank theorem of Thoger Bang), and the sum of the inradii of the $C_i$ is at least the inradius of $K$ (this is due to Vladimir Kadets). We adapt the existing proofs of these results to prove a theorem on coverings by certain generalized non-convex "multi-planks". One corollary of this approach is a family of inequalities interpolating between Bang's theorem and Kadets's theorem. Other corollaries include results reminiscent of the Davenport--Alexander problem, such as the following: if an $m$-slice pizza cutter (that is, the union of $m$ equiangular rays in the plane with the same endpoint) in applied $N$ times to the unit disk, then there will be a piece of the partition of inradius at least $\frac{\sin π/m}{N + \sin π/m}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.