Paper detail

A morphological analysis of gamma-ray burst early optical afterglows

Within the framework of the external shock model of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) afterglows, we perform a morphological analysis of the early optical lightcurves to directly constrain model parameters. We define four morphological types, i.e. the reverse shock dominated cases with/without the emergence of the forward shock peak (Type I/ Type II), and the forward shock dominated cases without/with $ν_m$ crossing the band (Type III/IV). We systematically investigate all the Swift GRBs that have optical detection earlier than 500 s and find 3/63 Type I bursts (4.8%), 12/63 Type II bursts (19.0%), 30/63 Type III bursts (47.6%), 8/63 Type IV bursts (12.7%) and 10/63 Type III/IV bursts (15.9%). We perform Monte Carlo simulations to constrain model parameters in order to reproduce the observations. We find that the favored value of the magnetic equipartition parameter in the forward shock ($ε_B^f$) ranges from $10^{-6}$ to $10^{-2}$, and the reverse-to-forward ratio of $ε_B$ ($R_B$) is about 100. The preferred electron equipartition parameter $ε_e^{r,f}$ value is 0.01, which is smaller than the commonly assumed value, e.g., 0.1. This could mitigate the so- called "efficiency problem" for the internal shock model, if $ε_e$ during the prompt emission phase (in the internal shocks) is large (say, $\sim 0.1$). The preferred $R_B$ value is in agreement with the results in previous works that indicates a moderately magnetized baryonic jet for GRBs.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.