Paper detail

A Monte Carlo Study of Flux Ratios of Raman Scattered O~VI Features at 6825 Å and 7082 Å in Symbiotic Stars

Symbiotic stars are regarded as wide binary systems consisting of a hot white dwarf and a mass losing giant. They exhibit unique spectral features at 6825 Å and 7082 Å, which are formed via Raman scattering of \ion{O}{6}$λλ$ 1032 and 1038 with atomic hydrogen. We adopt a Monte Carlo technique to generate the same number of \ion{O}{6}$λ$1032 and $λ$1038 line photons and compute the flux ratio $F(6825)/F(7082)$ of these Raman scattered \ion{O}{6} features formed in neutral regions with a simple geometric shape as a function of \ion{H}{1} column density $N_{HI}$. In cylindrical and spherical neutral regions with the \ion{O}{6} source embedded inside, the flux ratio $F(6825)/F(7082)$ shows an overall decrease from 3 to 1 as $N_{HI}$ increases in the range $10^{22-24}{\rm\ cm^{-2}}$. In the cases of a slab geometry and other geometries with the \ion{O}{6} source outside the \ion{H}{1} region, Rayleigh escape operates to lower the flux ratio considerably. For moderate values of $N_{HI}\sim 10^{23}{\rm\ cm^{-2}}$ the flux ratio behaves in a complicated way to exhibit a broad bump with a peak value of 3.5 in the case of a sphere geometry. We find that the ratio of Raman conversion efficiencies of \ion{O}{6}$λλ$1032, 1038 ranges from 0.8 to 3.5. Our high resolution spectra of 'D' type HM~Sge and 'S' type AG~Dra obtained with the {\it Canada-France-Hawaii-Telescope} show that the flux ratio $F(6825)/F(7082)$ of AG~Dra is significantly smaller than that of HM~Sge, implying that 'S' type symbiotics are characterized by higher $N_{HI}$ than 'D' type symbiotics.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.