Paper detail

A Monte Carlo investigation of secondary electron emission from solid targets: spherical symmetry versus momentum conservation within the classical binary collision model

A Monte Carlo scheme is described where the secondary electron generation has been incorporated. The initial position of a secondary electron due to Fermi sea excitation is assumed to be where the inelastic collision took place, while the polar and azimuth angles of secondary electrons can be calculated in two different ways. The first one assumes a random direction of the secondary electrons, corresponding to the idea that slow secondary electrons should be generated with spherical symmetry. Such an approach violates momentum conservation. The second way of calculating the polar and azimuth angles of the secondary electrons takes into account the momentum conservation rules within the classical binary collision model. The aim of this paper is to compare the results of these two different approaches for the determination of the energy distribution of the secondary electrons emitted by solid targets.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.