Paper detail

A Monte Carlo Approach to the Fluctuation Problem in Optimal Alignments of Random Strings

The problem of determining the correct order of fluctuation of the optimal alignment score of two random strings of length $n$ has been open for several decades. It is known that the biased expected effect of a random letter-change on the optimal score implies an order of fluctuation linear in $\sqrt{n}$. However, in many situations where such a biased effect is observed empirically, it has been impossible to prove analytically. The main result of this paper shows that when the rescaled-limit of the optimal alignment score increases in a certain direction, then the biased effect exists. On the basis of this result one can quantify a confidence level for the existence of such a biased effect and hence of an order $\sqrt{n}$ fluctuation based on simulation of optimal alignments scores.This is an important step forward, as the correct order of fluctuation was previously known only for certain special distributions. To illustrate the usefulness of our new methodology, we apply it to optimal alignments of strings written in the DNA-alphabet. As scoring function, we use the BLASTZ default-substitution matrix together with a realistic gap penalty. BLASTZ is one of the most widely used sequence alignment methodologies in bioinformatics. For this DNA-setting, we show that with a high level of confidence, the fluctuation of the optimal alignment score is of order $Θ(\sqrt{n})$. An important special case of optimal alignment score is the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) of random strings. For binary sequences with equiprobable symbols, the question of the fluctuation of the LCS remains open. The symmetry in that case does not allow for our method. On the other hand, in real-life DNA sequences, it is not the case that all letters occur with the same frequency. Thus, for many real life situations, our method allows to determine the order of the fluctuation up to a high confidence level.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.