Paper detail

A Modular Algorithm for Computing Polynomial GCDs over Number Fields presented with Multiple Extensions

We consider the problem of computing the monic gcd of two polynomials over a number field L = Q(alpha_1,...,alpha_n). Langemyr and McCallum have already shown how Brown's modular GCD algorithm for polynomials over Q can be modified to work for Q(alpha) and subsequently, Langemyr extended the algorithm to L[x]. Encarnacion also showed how to use rational number to make the algorithm for Q(alpha) output sensitive, that is, the number of primes used depends on the size of the integers in the gcd and not on bounds based on the input polynomials. Our first contribution is an extension of Encarnacion's modular GCD algorithm to the case n>1, which, like Encarnacion's algorithm, is is output sensitive. Our second contribution is a proof that it is not necessary to test if p divides the discriminant. This simplifies the algorithm; it is correct without this test. Our third contribution is a modification to the algorithm to treat the case of reducible extensions. Such cases arise when solving systems of polynomial equations. Our fourth contribution is an implementation of the modular GCD algorithm in Maple and in Magma. Both implementations use a recursive dense polynomial data structure for representing polynomials over number fields with multiple field extensions. Our fifth contribution is a primitive fraction-free algorithm. This is the best non-modular approach. We present timing comparisons of the Maple and Magma implementations demonstrating various optimizations and comparing them with the monic Euclidan algorithm and our primitive fraction-free algorithm.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.