Paper detail

A Modified Union Bound on Symbol Error Probability for Fading Channels

In this paper, we propose a new upper bound on the error probability performance of maximum-likelihood (ML) detection. The proposed approach provides a much tighter upper bound when compared to the traditionally used union bound, especially when the number of pairwise error probabilities (PEPs) is large. In fact, the proposed approach tightens the union bound by first assuming that a detection error always occurs in a deep fading event where the channel gain is lower than a certain threshold. A minimisation is then taken with respect to the gain threshold in order to make the upper bound as tight as possible. We also prove that the objective function has a single minimiser under several general assumptions so that the minimiser can be easily found using optimisation algorithms. The expression of the new upper bound under correlated Rayleigh fading channels is derived and several analytical and numerical examples are provided to show the performance of the proposed bound.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.