Paper detail

A model of virus infection with immune responses supports boosting CTL response to balance antibody response

We analyze a within-host model of virus infection with antibody and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses proposed by Schwartz et al. (2013). The goal of this work is to gain an overview of the stability of the biologically-relevant equilibria as a function of the model's immune response parameters. We show that the equilibria undergo at most two forward transcritical bifurcations. The model is also explored numerically and results are applied to equine infectious anemia virus infection. In order to arrive at stability of the biologically-relevant endemic equilibrium characterized by coexistence of antibody and CTL responses, the parameters promoting CTL responses need to be boosted over parameters promoting antibody production. This result may seem counter-intuitive (in that a weaker antibody response is better) but can be understood in terms of a balance between CTL and antibody responses that is needed to permit existence of CTLs. In conclusion, an intervention such as a vaccine that is intended to control a persistent viral infection with both immune responses should moderate the antibody response to allow for stimulation of the CTL response.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.