Paper detail

A Model of the Spectral Evolution of Pulsar Wind Nebulae

Recent observations suggest that many old pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) are bright TeV gamma-ray sources without a strong X-ray counterpart. In this paper, we study the spectral evolution of PWNe taking into account the energy which was injected when they were young for old PWNe. We model the evolution of the magnetic field and solve for the particle distribution inside a uniformly expanding PWN. The model is calibrated by fitting the calculated spectrum to the observations of the Crab Nebula at an age of a thousand years. We find that only a small fraction of the injected energy from the Crab Pulsar goes to the magnetic field, consistent with previous studies. The spectral evolution model of the Crab Nebula shows that the flux ratio of TeV gamma-rays to X-rays increases with time, which implies that old PWNe are faint at X-rays, but not at TeV gamma-rays. The increase of this ratio is primarily because the magnetic field decreases with time and is not because the X-ray emitting particles are cooled more rapidly than the TeV gamma-ray emitting particles. Our spectral evolution model matches the observed rate of the radio flux decrease of the Crab Nebula.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.