Paper detail

A Model of Pupal Water Loss in Glossina

The results of a long-established investigation into pupal transpiration are used as a rudimentary data set. These data are then generalised to all temperatures and humidities by invoking the property of multiplicative separability, as well as by converting established relationships in terms of constant humidity at fixed temperature, to alternatives in terms of a calculated water loss. In this way a formulation which is a series of very simple, first order, ordinary differential equations is devised. The model is extended to include a variety of Glossina species using their relative surface areas, their relative pupal and puparial loss rates and their different 4th instar excretions. The resulting computational model calculates total, pupal water loss, consequent mortality and emergence. Remaining fat reserves are a more tenuous result. The model suggests that, while conventional wisdom is often correct in dismissing variability in transpiration-related pupal mortality as insignificant, the effects of transpiration can be profound under adverse conditions and for some species, in general. The model demonstrates how two gender effects, the more significant one at the drier extremes of tsetse fly habitat, might arise. The agreement between calculated and measured critical water losses suggests very little difference in the behaviour of the different species.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.