Paper detail

A Model of Job Parallelism for Latency Reduction in Large-Scale Systems

Processing computation-intensive jobs at multiple processing cores in parallel is essential in many real-world applications. In this paper, we consider an idealised model for job parallelism in which a job can be served simultaneously by $d$ distinct servers. The job is considered complete when the total amount of work done on it by the $d$ servers equals its size. We study the effect of parallelism on the average delay of jobs. Specifically, we analyze a system consisting of $n$ parallel processor sharing servers in which jobs arrive according to a Poisson process of rate $n λ$ ($λ<1$) and each job brings an exponentially distributed amount of work with unit mean. Upon arrival, a job selects $d$ servers uniformly at random and joins all the chosen servers simultaneously. We show by a mean-field analysis that, for fixed $d \geq 2$ and large $n$, the average occupancy of servers is $O(\log (1/(1-λ)))$ as $λ\to 1$ in comparison to $O(1/(1-λ))$ average occupancy for $d=1$. Thus, we obtain an exponential reduction in the response time of jobs through parallelism. We make significant progress towards rigorously justifying the mean-field analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.