Paper detail

A model independent parametrization of the late time cosmic acceleration: constraints on the parameters from recent observations

In this work, we have considered a model independent approach to study the nature of the late time cosmic acceleration. We have used the Pade approximation to parametrize the comoving distance. Consequently, from this comoving distance, we derive a parameterization for the Hubble parameter. Our parametrization is completely analytic and valid for late-time and matter dominated eras only. This parametrization possesses sub-percentage accuracy compared to any arbitrary cosmological model or parametrization up to matter dominated era. Using this parametrization, we put constraints on the parameters from recent low redshift cosmological observations including Planck 2018 distance priors. Our results show that the $Λ$CDM model is 1$σ$ to 2$σ$ away for lower redshifts. We find that the phantom crossing is allowed by all the combinations of dataset considered. We also find that the dynamical dark energy models are preferable at lower redshifts. Our study also shows that, at lower redshifts ($z<0.5$), phantom models are allowed at almost 1$σ$ confidence level.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.