Paper detail

A model-independent fit to Planck and BICEP2 data

Inflation is the leading theory to describe elegantly the initial conditions that led to structure formation in our universe. In this paper, we present a novel phenomenological fit to the Planck, WMAP polarisation (WP) and the BICEP2 datasets using an alternative parameterisation. Instead of starting from inflationary potentials and computing the inflationary observables, we use a phenomenological parameterisation due to Mukhanov, describing inflation by an effective equation-of-state, in terms of the number of e-folds and two phenomenological parameters $α$ and $β$. Within such a parametrisation, which captures the different inflationary models in a model-independent way, the values of the scalar spectral index $n_s$, its running and the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ are predicted, given a set of parameters $(α,β)$. We perform a Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis of these parameters, and we show that the combined analysis of Planck and WP data favours the Starobinsky and Higgs inflation scenarios. Assuming that the BICEP2 signal is not entirely due to foregrounds, the addition of this last data set prefers instead the $ϕ^2$ chaotic models. The constraint we get from Planck and WP data alone on the derived tensor-to-scalar ratio is $r<0.18$ at $95\%$~CL, value which is consistent with the one quoted from the BICEP2 collaboration analysis, $r = 0.16^{+0-06}_{-0.05}$, after foreground subtraction. This is not necessarily at odds with the $2σ$ tension found between Planck and BICEP2 measurements when analysing data in terms of the usual $n_s$ and $r$ parameters, given that the parameterisation used here includes, implicitly, a running spectral index.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.