Paper detail

A Model for the Spectral Energy Distribution of the Ultraluminous Galaxy IRAS F10214+4724

If indeed early type galaxies used up most of their gas to form stars in a time short compared to their collapse time and if a roughly constant fraction of metals is locked up in dust grains, these galaxies may easily become opaque to starlight and emit most of their luminosity in the far-IR. The corresponding spectral energy distribution matches remarkably well the observed continuum spectrum of the ultraluminous galaxy IRAS F$10214+4724$ from UV to sub-mm wavelengths, i.e. over almost four decades in frequency, for a galactic age $\lsim 1\,$Gyr. The bolometric luminosity in this model is $\simeq 2.7\times 10^{14}\Lsol$ ($H_0 =50\,\hbox{km}\,\hbox{s}^{-1} \,\hbox{Mpc}^{-1}$, $Ω=1$), i.e. somewhat lower than implied by previous models. In the present framework, the bolometric luminosity of the galaxy is expected to decrease by a factor $\gsim 30$ during the subsequent evolution.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.